A 5-Year History of Laparoscopic Gastric Band Removals: an Analysis of Complications and Associated Comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the factors contributing to laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removals among adults > 18 years of age. We hypothesized that female patients with multiple comorbidities would have increased removals. DESIGN: This retrospective exploratory study uses internal records and standard statistical methods of analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-five bands were removed (11.8% males, 88.2% females). The average BMI was 40.7 (n = 83). 2.4% of patients had removals between 0 and 12 months, 18.8% between 39 and 51 months, and 35.3% between 39 and 64 months. 8.2% of treatment times were unknown. The average treatment time was 67.9 months. 48.2% of patients had ≥ 2 comorbidities, GERD (44.2%) being the most frequent. 49.4% of patients reported dysphagia as the reason for band removal. 22.4% of removals were associated with band failures, none with port complications. The reason for band removal was unknown in 21.2% of patients. 67.1%, 32.9%, and 23.5% attended 30-, 60-, and 90-day follow-up appointments, respectively. Weight post-band removal surgery at 30, 60, and 90 days was noted to be - 0.4%., 0.9%, and 0.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study supports current literature suggesting LAGB may not be an effective long-term surgical intervention for obesity. Patients with > 2 comorbidities had increased rates of removal. Dysphagia was noted to be the primary reason cited for LAGB removal. Postoperative follow-up was found to be a significant challenge for LAGB removal patients. Further study is warranted to explore if these poor follow-up rates should be considered when risk stratifying LAGB patients for revisional surgery.

Radiographic Change of the Distal Tibiofibular Joint Following Removal of Transfixing Screw Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Syndesmosis disruptions in the ankle joint are typically treated with anatomic reduction followed by transfixing screw and/or suture button fixation. The purpose of our study was to analyze the effects of the removal of transfixing screws on syndesmosis integrity using plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: Twenty-nine cases (29 patients) who had been treated with transfixing screw fixation for syndesmosis disruptions were studied prospectively. Plain radiographs and CT scans were obtained 1 day before and 3 months after the removal of transfixing screws. The tibiofibular clear space (TCS) and tibiofibular overlap (TFO) were measured on plain radiographs, and the anterior and posterior measurement ratio (A/P ratio) of the syndesmosis was measured on axial CT scans to radiographically analyze the effect of the removal of screws on syndesmosis integrity. RESULTS: On plain radiographs, syndesmosis diastasis was not observed before or after the removal of transfixing screws. No statistically significant difference was found in the TCS and the TFO between measurements at prescrew removal and at postscrew removal ( P = .761 and .628, respectively). However, the syndesmosis was found malreduced on CT scans in 7 cases (24.1%) before screw removal. All 7 cases showed anterior malreduction of the syndesmosis, 5 (71.4%) of which spontaneously reduced after screw removal. The A/P ratio of the 7 cases decreased from a mean of 1.37 (range, 1.26-1.61) at prescrew removal to a mean of 1.12 (range, 0.96-1.25) at postscrew removal ( P = .016). CONCLUSION: Syndesmosis malreduction not observed on plain radiographs after performing transfixing screw fixation was identified with CT scans. Of the cases with a malreduced syndesmosis, 71.4% showed spontaneous reduction after screw removal. Therefore, we believe the removal of transfixing screws is recommended after confirming malreduction on CT scans, although plain radiographs demonstrate anatomic reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective prognostic study.

Gastrostomy Tube Weaning and Treatment of Severe Selective Eating in Childhood: Experience in Israel Using an Intensive Three Week Program.

BACKGROUND: Children dependent on gastrostomy tube feeding and those with extremely selective eating comprise the most challenging groups of early childhood eating disorders. We established, for the first time in Israel, a 3 week intensive weaning and treatment program for these patients based on the "Graz model." OBJECTIVES: To investigate the Graz model for tube weaning and for treating severe selective eating disorders in one center in Israel. METHODS: Pre-program assessment of patients' suitability to participate was performed 3 months prior to the study, and a treatment goal was set for each patient. The program included a multidisciplinary outpatient or inpatient 3 week treatment course. The major outcome measures were achievement of the target goal of complete or partial tube weaning for those with tube dependency, and expansion of the child's nutritional diversity for those with selective eating. RESULTS: Thirty-four children, 28 with tube dependency and 6 with selective eating, participated in four programs conducted over 24 months. Their mean age was 4.3 ± 0.37 years. Of all patients, 29 (85%) achieved the target goal (24 who were tube-dependent and 5 selective eaters). One patient was excluded due to aspiration pneumonia. After 6 months follow-up, 24 of 26 available patients (92%) maintained their target or improved. CONCLUSIONS: This intensive 3 week program was highly effective in weaning children with gastrostomy tube dependency and ameliorating severe selective eating. Preliminary evaluation of the family is necessary for completion of the program and achieving the child's personal goal, as are an experienced multidisciplinary team and the appropriate hospital setup, i.e., inpatient or outpatient.

UK survey of clinical consistency in tracheostomy management.

BACKGROUND: Many speech and language therapists (SLTs) work with patients who have a tracheostomy. There is limited information about their working practices and the extent to which recent publications and research have influenced the speech and language therapy management of the tracheostomized patient. AIMS: This study reviews the current patterns of clinical practice for SLTs in the management of adult tracheostomized patients in the UK. METHODS & PROCEDURES: An online questionnaire was completed by 106 SLTs with prior experience in tracheostomy management. The information from this was explored to determine patterns of practice across various areas of speech and language therapy tracheostomy management including clinical roles and responsibilities, management of communication disorders, and assessment and management of dysphagia and decannulation. These clinical patterns were then examined with respect to the current literature, emerging patterns in evidence-based practice and national practice guidelines. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: The results indicate a moderate to high level of clinical consistency in the majority of areas evaluated across the scope of tracheostomy management in speech and language therapy. Consistency in practice areas such as increased utilization of instrumental assessments and conservative use of the Modified Evans Blue Dye Test indicate clinical application in line with current research. Limited clinical consensus or inconsistencies in evidence-based services were identified in aspects of practice that are supported by conflicting or emerging research evidence. Such areas include involvement in cuff deflation regimes, adoption of specific decannulation procedures and participation in multidisciplinary team management. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: SLTs in the UK provide a moderate to high level of consistent practice in tracheostomy management. This study identifies areas of tracheostomy management that require further research in order to establish clinical practice guidelines and to address discrepancies between research evidence and clinical implementation.